Backup: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Burp) |
(→How?) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
List of backup software. |
List of backup software. |
||
=== Attic === |
|||
⚫ | |||
Maybe best to consider its fork instead: BorgBackup. |
|||
=== BackupPC === |
=== BackupPC === |
||
See [[BackupPC]]. |
See [[BackupPC]]. |
||
=== BorgBackup === |
|||
⚫ | |||
Borg is actually a fork of Attic. |
|||
* [https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/42feqz/i_asked_here_for_the_optimal_backup_solution_and/ Reddit post] |
|||
: With interesting comments, config... Also mention cloud solution rsync.net with support for Borg/Attic and ZFS. |
|||
=== Bup === |
=== Bup === |
||
Line 12: | Line 25: | ||
See [[Burp]]. |
See [[Burp]]. |
||
=== |
=== Obnam === |
||
* https://obnam.org/ |
|||
⚫ | |||
: [https://obnam.org/tutorial/ Tutorial], [http://code.liw.fi/obnam/manual/manual.html manual]. |
|||
;Reviews |
|||
* [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/130727/what-is-the-expected-performance-of-obnam-or-why-is-it-so-slow What is the expected performance of obnam? Or: why is it so slow?] |
|||
;Pros: |
|||
* Can be tuned to make it much faster (up to 10x, with extra memory though) [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/130727/what-is-the-expected-performance-of-obnam-or-why-is-it-so-slow] |
|||
;Cons: |
|||
* Slow with small files [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bup-list/QNYW_VsaJqg/PnsGOThi1lkJ] |
|||
* Very slow, in particular large backup [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/130727/what-is-the-expected-performance-of-obnam-or-why-is-it-so-slow], [http://librelist.com/browser/attic/2015/3/31/comparison-of-attic-vs-bup-vs-obnam/]. |
|||
=== SimpleSnap === |
|||
[http://changelog.complete.org/archives/9168-backing-up-every-few-minutes-with-simplesnap SimpleSnap] is a tool to backup ZFS snapshots easily. |
|||
Pros: |
|||
* Very fast snapshot (25s). |
|||
Cons |
|||
* Requires ZFS |
|||
* Not cross-machine deduplication. |
|||
Speed seems very interesting. But how setup ZFS? Maybe some hints in this [http://changelog.complete.org/archives/5547-research-on-deduplicating-disk-based-and-cloud-backups benchmark] from same author. |
|||
=== Other === |
=== Other === |
||
* Amanda |
* Amanda |
||
⚫ | |||
* Bacula |
* Bacula |
||
* [https://labs.riseup.net/code/projects/backupninja/wiki/Usage Backupninja] |
* [https://labs.riseup.net/code/projects/backupninja/wiki/Usage Backupninja] |
||
Line 27: | Line 62: | ||
* [https://www.urbackup.org/administration_manual.html UrBackup] |
* [https://www.urbackup.org/administration_manual.html UrBackup] |
||
* [http://zbackup.org/ ZBackup] |
* [http://zbackup.org/ ZBackup] |
||
* [https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/s3ql/ S3QL] |
|||
== How well? == |
|||
Backup reviews: |
|||
List of backup reviews: |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
: Review Bacula, Amanda, Backupninja, Backuppc, and UrBackup. Also cite Rsnapshot, rdiff-backup, Burp, Duplicity, SafeKeep, DREBS. |
: Review Bacula, Amanda, Backupninja, Backuppc, and UrBackup. Also cite Rsnapshot, rdiff-backup, Burp, Duplicity, SafeKeep, DREBS. |
||
* [http://librelist.com/browser/attic/2015/3/31/comparison-of-attic-vs-bup-vs-obnam/ Comparison of Attic vs Bup vs Obnam (March 31, 2015)] |
|||
: Attic wins hands down on big data set for backup, and in all cases for restore (much much faster). |
|||
* [https://anarc.at/blog/2014-11-18-bup-vs-attic-silly-benchmark/ bup vs attic silly benchmark] |
|||
: Both looks similar. Attic a bit faster. |
|||
* [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Synchronization_and_backup_programs#Chunk-based_increments Synchronization and backup programs] |
|||
: Compare features of many different backup software. See also update from [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Level323 User:Level323]. |
|||
* [https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/1364 Compare Borg to *] |
|||
: Issue tracker on Borg to compare it with alternatives. |
|||
* [http://changelog.complete.org/archives/9353-roundup-of-remote-encrypted-deduplicated-backups-in-linux Roundup of remote encrypted deduplicated backups in Linux] |
|||
: Mainly compare Obnam and Attic/Borg. |
|||
* [http://changelog.complete.org/archives/5547-research-on-deduplicating-disk-based-and-cloud-backups Research on deduplicating disk-based and cloud backups] |
|||
: Compare ext4, S3QL, SDFS, zfs-fuse (fastest). |
|||
* [http://www.freehackers.org/Backup Backup on freehackers.org] |
|||
: Very long list of backup software with Pros and Cons. |
|||
== What? == |
== What? == |
Revision as of 06:29, 2 May 2017
How?
List of backup software.
Attic
Maybe best to consider its fork instead: BorgBackup.
BackupPC
See BackupPC.
BorgBackup
See Borg on GitHub.
Borg is actually a fork of Attic.
- With interesting comments, config... Also mention cloud solution rsync.net with support for Borg/Attic and ZFS.
Bup
See Bup.
Burp
See Burp.
Obnam
- Reviews
- Pros
- Can be tuned to make it much faster (up to 10x, with extra memory though) [1]
- Cons
SimpleSnap
SimpleSnap is a tool to backup ZFS snapshots easily.
Pros:
- Very fast snapshot (25s).
Cons
- Requires ZFS
- Not cross-machine deduplication.
Speed seems very interesting. But how setup ZFS? Maybe some hints in this benchmark from same author.
Other
- Amanda
- Bacula
- Backupninja
- brackup
- Duplicity
- rdiff-backup (review)
- rsync (Optimal remote backups with rsync over Samba)
- UrBackup
- ZBackup
- S3QL
How well?
List of backup reviews:
- Review Bacula, Amanda, Backupninja, Backuppc, and UrBackup. Also cite Rsnapshot, rdiff-backup, Burp, Duplicity, SafeKeep, DREBS.
- Attic wins hands down on big data set for backup, and in all cases for restore (much much faster).
- Both looks similar. Attic a bit faster.
- Compare features of many different backup software. See also update from User:Level323.
- Issue tracker on Borg to compare it with alternatives.
- Mainly compare Obnam and Attic/Borg.
- Compare ext4, S3QL, SDFS, zfs-fuse (fastest).
- Very long list of backup software with Pros and Cons.
What?
A backup checklist.
On Linux
- /home directory
- /etc directory
- /usr/local directory
- /root directory
In addition:
- Get a copy of crontab (although they are in /var. For each user:
crontab -l
- Copy all mysql database (although they are in /var and /etc.
sudo su -
mysqldump -u root -p --all-databases > mysql-$hostname.dump