Backup: Difference between revisions

From miki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 53: Line 53:


Speed seems very interesting. But how setup ZFS? Maybe some hints in this [http://changelog.complete.org/archives/5547-research-on-deduplicating-disk-based-and-cloud-backups benchmark] from same author.
Speed seems very interesting. But how setup ZFS? Maybe some hints in this [http://changelog.complete.org/archives/5547-research-on-deduplicating-disk-based-and-cloud-backups benchmark] from same author.

=== UrBackup ===
[https://www.urbackup.org/administration_manual.html UrBackup].

Looks promising. Server-centric like BackupPC.


=== Other ===
=== Other ===
Line 63: Line 68:
* rdiff-backup ([https://www.tummy.com/blogs/2009/12/10/rsync-and-rdiff-backup-two-great-tastes-that-go-great-together/ review])
* rdiff-backup ([https://www.tummy.com/blogs/2009/12/10/rsync-and-rdiff-backup-two-great-tastes-that-go-great-together/ review])
* rsync ([https://www.thanassis.space/backup.html Optimal remote backups with rsync over Samba])
* rsync ([https://www.thanassis.space/backup.html Optimal remote backups with rsync over Samba])
* [https://www.urbackup.org/administration_manual.html UrBackup]
* [http://zbackup.org/ ZBackup]
* [http://zbackup.org/ ZBackup]
* [https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/s3ql/ S3QL]
* [https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/s3ql/ S3QL]

Revision as of 20:24, 7 May 2017

How?

List of backup software.

Attic

Maybe best to consider its fork instead: BorgBackup.

BackupPC

See BackupPC.

BorgBackup

See BorgBackup.

Borg is actually a fork of Attic.

With interesting comments, config... Also mention cloud solution rsync.net with support for Borg/Attic and ZFS.

Bup

See Bup.

Burp

See Burp.

First impressions
  • Protocol 1 appears fast, but doesn't do cross-client deduplication. Protocol 2 is still experimental, and is very slow.

Obnam

Tutorial, manual.
Reviews
Pros
  • Can be tuned to make it much faster (up to 10x, with extra memory though) [1]
Cons
  • Slow with small files [2]
  • Very slow, in particular large backup [3], [4].

SimpleSnap

SimpleSnap is a tool to backup ZFS snapshots easily.

Pros:

  • Very fast snapshot (25s).

Cons

  • Requires ZFS
  • Not cross-machine deduplication.

Speed seems very interesting. But how setup ZFS? Maybe some hints in this benchmark from same author.

UrBackup

UrBackup.

Looks promising. Server-centric like BackupPC.

Other

How well?

List of backup reviews:

Review Bacula, Amanda, Backupninja, Backuppc, and UrBackup. Also cite Rsnapshot, rdiff-backup, Burp, Duplicity, SafeKeep, DREBS.
Attic wins hands down on big data set for backup, and in all cases for restore (much much faster).
Both looks similar. Attic a bit faster.
Compare features of many different backup software. See also update from User:Level323.
Issue tracker on Borg to compare it with alternatives.
Mainly compare Obnam and Attic/Borg.
Compare ext4, S3QL, SDFS, zfs-fuse (fastest).
Very long list of backup software with Pros and Cons.

What?

A backup checklist.

On Linux

  • /home directory
  • /etc directory
  • /usr/local directory
  • /root directory

In addition:

  • Get a copy of crontab (although they are in /var. For each user:
crontab -l
  • Copy all mysql database (although they are in /var and /etc.
sudo su -
mysqldump -u root -p --all-databases > mysql-$hostname.dump